Products About Us Testimonials Order Now Contact Us
Parenting Products
Expert Testimonials
Parent Testimonials
How EasyChild Works
Product Tour
Guarantee
EasyChild Report: Working With Children Through Operant Conditioning Learning
By Encourage Software & Dr. Jeffery M. Bruns, PhD
Contents
Previous

Next

Send to a Friend
Microsoft Word Format
Download Report
Adobe PDF Format
Download Report
Dr. Jeffery M. Bruns
Biography
     
 

Education as a Science

The application of Operant Conditioning in education is simple and direct. “Teaching is the arrangement of contingencies of reinforcement under which students learn” (Skinner, 1965). When children learn randomly and results are blatant. Our children should be taught directly.

EasyChild shows parents how to create the structure and then implement it.

In the Technology of Teaching (1968), Skinner addresses shaping as a foundation to instruction in educational settings. Operant Conditioning learning has been adopted in developing direct instructional reading programs. These models shape the behavior using programmed feedback. The scope and sequence is developed around an instructional technique of model, lead, practice, and test. Carnie and Sibert describe the process of reading in their book, Direct Instruction Reading (1979). Their approach to reading philosophy and programs are based on experimental research of a federally funded ten year study called Project Follow Through, which evaluated several learning approaches to reading. The ten year study compared Operant Conditioning learning to a Piaget Language approach (Carnie & Sibert, 1979). Only students in a direct instruction approach performed basic skills, cognitive and affective measures.

Prospects are good for success when programs have a foundation in learning principles. For instance, California chooses comprehensive reading programs that do not support research. Sacramento refuses to adopt any programs based on Operant Conditioning learning and purges all material influenced by this research. There are current legal battles between publishing companies whose programs were developed in accordance with the finding of the Project Follow Through. California will not acknowledge the efficacy for these programs and perhaps a result, California children have some of the lowest reading scores in the nation.